Monday, November 18, 2019
#FREESPEECH IN THE NEWS: November 18, 2019
As the Citadel of Free Speech here in Cleveland, we work to protect and promote the basis of our democracy by sharing related stories, commentary, and opinions on free speech in the 21st century. Here's what's making the news – and what you should know about – in the past week.
The letter ripped the judge as “incompetent” and “unfit to serve,” with expletives added for emphasis.
It got Derrick Jenkins thrown in Palm Beach County Jail for 30 days as part of a six-month probation sentence. He’s now appealing his contempt of court conviction, in a case that raises the question: Don’t you have a First Amendment right to criticize someone wearing a black robe?
Usually only outside of court, legal experts say. Still, Jenkins’ lawyers argue he was “engaged in political speech” and didn’t deserve any punishment for insulting Circuit Judge Howard K. Coates Jr.
Jenkins had slammed Coates in response to the judge’s decision to dismiss his $500 million civil lawsuit against the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office. The suit claimed his friend’s time was wasted over a seat belt citation.
In his letter, Jenkins complained that the judge issued his ruling without “a fair and impartial review,” among other perceived slights.
A county board in southern Wisconsin has backed away from a plan to prosecute journalists over their reporting on a water quality study and discipline elected officials for how they handle information about the research.
The Lafayette County Board on Tuesday night put off a decision on how to release information about private wells contaminated with fecal matter. The board shelved a resolution that said journalists would be prosecuted if they didn't quote a county news release verbatim when reporting on water quality. It also had threatened to punish officials who talked publicly without getting government permission.
The proposals drew criticism for violating First Amendment protections for freedom of speech.
A Kentucky man’s three-year legal battle ended Wednesday when a federal court ruled his request for a personalized license plate qualifies as private speech protected by the First Amendment, the Courier Journal reported.
Ben Hart attempted to obtain a vanity plate reading “IM GOD” in 2016, but the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet denied the request for violating antidiscrimination guidelines, The Associated Press reported. The Courier Journal, citing court documents, reported the transportation cabinet has previously approved such personalized plates as “GODLVS,” “TRYGOD,” “1GOD” and “NOGOD”.
In its ruling, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern Court of Kentucky wrote: “The Commonwealth [of Kentucky] went too far…To allow such plates as ‘IM4GOD’ and ‘LUVGOD’ but reject ‘IM GOD’ belies viewpoint neutrality…Regardless, the court concludes that in this case, [the statute governing such license plates] is an unreasonable and therefore impermissible restriction on Mr. Hart’s First Amendment rights.”