It can be argued we're living in an era that celebrates and elevates wealthy philanthropists. Dozens of the world's billionaires, including Bill and Melinda Gates, Warren Buffet, and Mark Zuckerberg, have signed The Giving Pledge, promising to give away at least half of their wealth to solve social problems. Their causes vary - everything from education reform to alleviating poverty to improving global health - but all come with the promise to change the world.
Largely, the reaction to these individuals and their philanthropic pursuits has been positive. However, some critics are beginning to surface, re-naming these efforts "big philanthropy" and classifying them as an exercise of power - and, in some cases, going so far as to call them a threat to democracy.
In Winners Take All: The Elite Charade of Changing the World, Anand Giridharadas writes, "the winners in our highly inequitable status quo declare themselves partisans of change...they reflect a highly influential view that the winners of an unjust status quo are the secret to redressing the injustices."
Who should be responsible for initiating large-scale social change? What are the risks and benefits of allowing billionaires the freedom to change the world as see fit? And, can this kind of philanthropy actually be a threat to democracy?
Join us for lunch and conversation as we discuss Winners Take All: The Elite Charade of Changing the World at the City Club Book Club.
The author of Winners Take All: The Elite Charade of Changing the World, Anand Giridharadas, will not be at this peer to peer discussion.
The ideas expressed in City Club forums are those of the speakers, and not of the City Club, Ideastream Public Media, or their sponsors.